On the Razor’s Edge

As much back in time we go as much better we were mentally, physically and spiritually. The illusion according to which we are better today because of our advanced technology is just this, an illusion. Yes, the technology we have today is more efficient, complex and demanding than in the past but the point here is that we have developed our modern technology not because we are better than our “savage, brutal, dirty and ape-like ancestors” (that’s what the ordinary people think of their forefathers) but because we are dramatically degenerated, in every sense.

polea-simple-fija

We need all the advanced technologies that we have developed to compensate  our weaknesses, disabilities and inability to survive and thrive in our natural environment, in Europe, as we should and as we have always done when we were hunter-gatherers. Imagine the system of the pulley: we have a desperate need of the applied force (the advanced technology) to raise the resisting force (ourselves, our chances to survive). Without an applied force of some kind we had, at a certain point of our history on this planet, zero possibilities to survive. With the passage of time we necessitated of an applied force increasingly stronger, to compensate at our more and more heavy resisting force, our more severe disabilities and our lost autonomy and independence. We are almost at the point where the resisting force is just too heavy and, soon or later but surely, the applied force will no more be able to support the weight; the applied force will cede and the resisting force will fall, long and hard to the ground (i.e. the vast majority of humanity will die, completely incapable to survive without the support of the applied force that permitted them to live until that moment). At that point the pulley will be broken and the best of us will flee its dominion and through natural selection will become totally independent, autonomous, master of themselves and they will live again in harmony with Nature, in their beloved Europe.

If we want to be among those survivors, we must learn to live a simpler life and prepare ourselves for what is to come.

shutterstock_248931799

“Men are nothing but men, and the greatest men are they who soonest learn the simpler things”

-Robert. E. Howard

robert_e_howard_suit

We started to need an “applied force” as a consequence of the Neanderthal/Sapiens hybridization and of its spread, that led to the abandonment of the way of life of the hunter-gatherers and to the birth of agriculture, of civilization (the only system that permitted us more chances of survival) and of the technological developments. The finger must point to the self-domestication of man! Exactly as domesticated animals, man became meekest and unable to live in the wild. The modern man is unconscious of his loss of autonomy, yet domesticated he continues blindly towards an increasingly serious and irreversible form of self-enslavement. The happiness of the domesticated man consists in serving serve as a tool in the machinery of civilization: the release from the yoke, being aware of it or not, is the last thing he wishes!

Beware, because civilization is on the razor’s edge…beneath it, barbarism…

stare-sul-filo-del-rasoio-300x244

Words of Wisdom #21

“Great son of Tydeus, why you ask me who I am? The generations of men are like leaves: the wind makes them fall but others will sprout on the flowering trees when spring comes. So the races of men, one is born, the other fades”.

-Glaucus to Diomedes in the Iliad

The crown of the tree represents the future, our future lives, when we’ll be reborn in the bodies of our descendants. The trunk of the tree represents the present, our current life. The roots of the tree represent the past, our past lives, when we died in the bodies of our ancestors. This is the European vision of life!
albero-dorme-2

Different Minds, different Skies

Today we (returned to) know everything about the Earth and the Solar System but it has not always been the case.

We had the exact same notions during Prehistory and during Antiquity but after the Judeo-Christians invaded our beloved Europe – murdering millions of us, destroying and burning every manifestation of our culture on which they pointed their eyes – they forced on our minds “the fact” that our planet would be flat, at the center of the Sky and that if we had reached its limits we would have ended up falling into the abyss. Those who opposed, like Galileo Galilei which sustained the Heliocentric System, were labeled as heretics and forced to publicly reject their knowledge. That is, when they were not silenced in the first place through threats, or burned alive, or tortured to death. Only in 1992 the Christians have officially admitted their “error” in relation to Galileo Galilei (sigh). Exclusively what the “holy scriptures” recited was to be believed. However the Renaissance came and we returned to our ancient science, for the desperation of the Judeo-Christians. If it was for them we should still believe today in their lies, and in the future as well, until the coming of their fictional “Armageddon”.

At that point, they tried to hammer in the heads of the Europeans the fact that also our ancestors during Antiquity and during Prehistory believed in the flatness of our planet. “Even Pagans believed to that, it was not a consequence of the wave of destruction and ignorance we brought in Europe! Oy vey!”. Then they started their distortion, corruption and willed misinterpretation of our mythologies, and today the Europeans generally think that our ancestors were indeed ignorant and this is would be proved by the fact that our mythologies tell all sort of things about the world where we live but none of them is (apparently) close to the truth.

***

Now, one of the most exploited and abused figures in this context is the one of Okeanos, a character of the Greek mythology. The Judeo-Christians have concluded that Okeanos was a river that surrounded our flat planet, delimiting the borders beyond which we would have fallen. In the best case Okeanos was a symbol for all the waters in our planet. That’s what they think

How the Judeo-Christians see Okeanos and our planet:
terra-piatta

Now, it is time for us to look at the figure of Okeanos, called Ægir (“[metaphysical] scare”, “awe”) in the Norse mythology, in a European perspective:

According to the Egyptian mythology everything came into being from Nun, the primeval Ocean/Waters, primordial source of any existing form. The Nun is an eternal and infinite space that corresponded to/represented what we today call “Universe”: the archaic thinking associated the concept of “water” to that of source of life and essence of purification and regeneration, with particular reference to the amniotic fluid. In the Universe, as in water, we can’t breathe and we float if gravity doesn’t affects us. The Nun, the Universe, was thus defined by the Egyptians as “the watery abyss of the sky” and “the father of the gods”, it was a creative power from which arose all forms of life. I quote some passages taken directly from an Egyptian sacred text:

“Here I am,
I that, swelling and overflowing the Abysses,
I generated, from them, the Waters of the Sky…
These waters, made me float on their liquid Spaces…
And that is why they remain in my power,
The Waters of the Sky!”.

-The Egyptian Book of the Dead

“Since this Earth has appeared
At the Dawn of Times, in the Ocean of the Sky,
Rising from the Primordial Caos…”.

-The Egyptian Book of the Dead

“I lean on the forehead of Ra
And I sail on the heavenly Ocean
Seated in peace, on the prow of his ship…”.

-The Egyptian Book of the Dead

“Look! He is alone in the middle of the heavenly Ocean
While he crosses the Horizon!”.

-The Egyptian Book of the Dead

Okeanos – the only one that could remain on his own when Zeus demanded the presence of the gods in the Olympus – was described as “tireless”, “deep/fluent”, “refluent on himself”, “with no waves”, “origin of everything”, “origin of the gods” (just like the Nun). It encircles the Earth and is in reality the Starry Sky/Universe. It has no waves because it has nothing to do with water as we understand it or maybe because the apparent motion of the fixed stars is very slow, calm and quiet. It is tireless and refluent on itself (terms that suggests a rotation) because even the Starry Sky/Universe was moving (apparently and very slowly) at the eyes of our ancestors, as a consequence of the Precession of the Equinoxes (a motion of our planet that they noticed and knew well, but I will not talk here of their knowledge about it). It is deep because compared to waters (that are very deep), but also because the Universe is infinite. It is the origin of everything because the Universe at the same time is and contains everything, it has given existence to all that has been, that is and that will be. It is the origin of the gods because without the Universe the Solar System would not exist (here “gods” refers to the “inhabitants” of the Solar System, i.e. the planets). It is the only one not constrained to visit the Olympus at the call of Zeus because only the planets of the Solar System are “constrained” to go to Olympus (the Sun), i.e. only the planets are affected by the gravitational attraction of the Sun, not the Starry Sky/Universe.

<<But>>, say the Judeo-Christians, <<it encircles the Earth>>!

The Earth of the myths is a plane, yes, but it is not our planet, it is a plane that passes through the four points/corners of the year, marked by the Equinoxes and Solstices, that is the Ecliptic. The “Earth” was the ideal plane passing through the four points/pillars of the year and this is the hidden meaning when a mythology talks about a flat or quadrangular Earth. The four corners that determine an “Earth” are the Zodiacal Constellations that arise behind the Sun (which changes slowly because of the Precession of the Equinoxes, creating at every “handover” a new “Earth”) in the days of the Equinoxes and Solstices, with particular care for the one that rises in the day of the Vernal Equinox.

Now, the Fixed Stars/Universe encircle the Ecliptic, encircle the Solar System, right?

Note: the prehistoric engraving with the form of a spiral may (also) depict a maelstrom, a symbol that refers to the Solar System and the various circles made by the swirling revolutions of the planets around the Sun at the center? The maelstrom (the first part of the name is connected to the verb mala [“grind”], perhaps in reference to the “grinding” of the eras as a consequence of the cosmic cycles) is known as the “navel of the sea”, where “navel” would be a reference to the Solar System and “sea” a reference to the Universe, the “watery abyss of the sky”.

spirals_01

Moreover, in the Iliad the shield that Hephaestus builds for Achilles is described in these terms:

“…the Pleiades, Hyades and the strength of Orion
and the Bear, that they call with the name of Wagon: she turns on itself and watches Orion,
and alone doesn’t get wet from the waters of Okeanos”.

In the Odyssey, Odysseus pays attention to the stars that Calypso advises him to follow:

“…fixed to the Pleiades, fixed to Boötes that sets late,
and to the Bear, that they call also with the name of Wagon,
and always she turns and Orion watches fearful,
and alone doesn’t get wet from the waters of Okeanos”.

Note: the part “doesn’t get wet from the waters of Okeanos” is taken from a prose version of the Iliad. The original term, that I have difficulties to translate, would be similar to “doesn’t take part to the washings of Okeanos”.

The Big Dipper is formed by the seven shiny stars of its constellation, but these make up only his backside. Only with the other thirteen, placed before and under the other seven, the whole figure takes the form of an animal. The Big Dipper/Ursa Major is a circumpolar constellation, thus always present above the horizon, that never sets in the course of the apparent motion of rotation of the Sky. It is thus visible for all the year in the Northern Hemisphere and never sets north of the 41° North (latitude of Madrid and Naples).

The fact that Ursa Major doesn’t get wet from the waters/washings of Okeanos is enough to understand that Okeanos is up high, is the Starry Sky/Universe, “the watery abyss of the sky”!

How the Europeans see the the Sky: sistema-solare-3bmeteo-64658

How the Judeo-Christians see the Sky:
pane-senza-lievito_gal_landscape1

Running towards Death

As it’s well known, Mercury is the deity with the main functions of Psychopompos and Messenger of the Gods.

Roman: Mercury
Greek: Hermes
Scandinavian: Odinn
Celtic: Lugh
Slavic: Svarog
Egyptian: Anubis

Odinn is not a messenger but a wayfarer, however these two features were originally the same and they referred to the same concept: movement, speed. Psychopompos derives from the greek ψυχοπομπóς, from “psyche” (“spirit”, “mind”) and “pompós” (“the one who sends”). He is the deity responsible to guide the spirits of the dead to their realm (the grave/burial mound), and from there back to life (again).

The question is, why him? Why Mercury/Hermes/Odinn is appointed with these tasks?

Let’s give a look to the planet Mercury: it performs a motion of revolution around the Sun in only 87,9 earth days approximately. It is the faster planet of the Solar System, its orbital period is the shortest amongst them all. By far. This explains the function of “messenger/wayfarer”.

immagine4

Being the faster of the planets it is also the first that completes the cycle of life-death-rebirth (the motion of revolution: “revolution” means “return to the point of origin” e.g. to birth: it completes a circular motion and returns to where it started. It lives, dies and revives, eternally). It is thus the one who has given the example to all the other “inhabitants” of the Solar System, it has been the guide and the model to follow, the one who showed and taught the way, the first ever to come back to the point of origin, i.e. the first to be born again.

The role of Psychopompos rightly belongs to him, as the one of Messenger of the Gods!

Ave Mercury! Hail Hermes! HailaR WôðanaR!

mercurio2

Words of Wisdom #17, #18 & #19

The swamp pheasant pecks every ten steps. Every hundred steps drinks, but refuses every food if caged. So it doesn’t envy the happiness of a King“.

-Zhuangzi

Once that Zuang-Zi was fishing in the river Pu, the King of Chu sended two of his dignitaries to make him these proffers: <<our prince>> they said <<would want to entrust to you his territory>>. Without raising his fishing rod, without even turn the head, Zhuang-Zi said to them: <<I’ve heard that in Chu there is a sacred turtle, dead from three thousand years. Our King preserves the shell in a basket, wrapped in a towel, at the top of the temple of his ancestors. Tell me, this turtle would not have preferred to live dragging its tail in the mud?>>. <<She would have preferred to live dragging its tail in the mud>> said the two dignitaries. <<Go away, then!>> said Zhuang-Zi <<I also prefer to drag my tail in the mud>>“.

-Zhuangzi

A certain prince invited Zhuang-Zi to become his minister. The philosopher answered to the messenger: <<Have you seen the ox destined to the sacrifice? It is covered by an embroidered saddle-cloth, and receives a ration of grass and beans. But one day it is leaded to the great temple for slaughter. Then it would prefer to be a solitary calf, but now how could it be?“.

-Zhuangzi

We are domesticated human beings, and we will remain such for at least quite some time. However, there are some things we can and should do meanwhile: do everything we can to avoid being domesticated until the point of non-return (as the vast majority of people in our times), do our best to remain free, independent, master of ourselves and healthy mentally, physically and spiritually. We have limits, based on our qualities, virtues and our destiny – and there are enemies that are doing all they can to enchain and exterminate the peoples of Europe – but despite everything this is that for which we should strive for!

zhuangzi

 

Last of a Kind

First read this: https://ancestorvoice.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/introversion-vs-extroversion/

And then this one: https://thuleanperspective.com/2013/10/14/hallow-heal/

“When I cannot stand alone, it will be time to die”.

-Robert E. Howard

reh_fence_photo

The introvert human being is absorbed by the subject: himself, his thoughts, his inner world and generally speaking with everything that is cyclical and eternal. The introvert gives a preponderant role to subjective factors (he does things in his own way, ignoring or despising the conformism of other people), devaluating the external reality (specifically civilization and its creations, the opinions of other people, conformism, materialism, superficiality), he feels a sort of unappeasable longing, a condition to which he has no more access, a void that must seek to compensate (namely the ability to fathom eternity).

The extrovert human being is absorbed by the object: the outer world, the people and things around him and generally speaking everything that has to do with civilization in all its forms and creations, namely everything that is artificial and finite. The extrovert attitude has a spontaneous relation with the object, adapts well and easily to circumstances and bends to conformism with unconscious satisfaction. This type of man has no critical, original and really autonomous thoughts, feels no attraction towards spirituality and nature from a transcendental point of view and is totally absorbed by the finite manifestations of reality.

What I want to suggest here is that introversion is a trait that we have inherited from the Neanderthal man (the Proto-European), while extroversion is a trait that appeared only and exclusively as a consequence of the hybridization between the Neanderthal man and the Homo Sapiens (the Proto-African).

Civilization is an outcome of extroversion, an extrovert entity directly related with the features of the domesticated and hybridized man. The extrovert human being fits perfectly well inside the mechanisms of civilization and is strongly domesticated, to the point of not realizing it.

celibato-al-renoir

On the other hand introversion is a feature that the best of us have inherited from our Neanderthal ancestors as they were prior to the hybridization, and it is linked with autism. Introverts often think for images, don’t care about the opinions of others, cannot bear noises, are deeply interested (almost obsessed) in specific subjects, fail to comply, love to stand on their own, to think and be surrounded by nature: all features found in the autistic spectrum.

P.S. I am NOT referring here to any type of autism with mental retardation. I refer only to High-Functioning Autism (Asperger Syndrome), an exclusively European feature.

solitude1

Before the last Ice Age reached its maximum, it is estimated that the European population counted between 4’500 and 6’000 inhabitants and at the end of it the density of the population varied between 0,04 and 0,1 persons for square kilometer, in relation to the ground and the climate. So it makes sense to think that introversion is a trait that we inherited from the Neanderthal man as he was in the Stone Age: he was not very social, he encountered only occasionally other people. It’s only a matter of time and we will return to be so, that we like it or not. The Ice Ages are the norm in Europe while hot periods are exceptions.

Graph showing the trend of Ice Ages:
hos_8

-Extroversion/Object/Domestication/Civilized Man(Post-Hybridization)/Finitude.
-Introversion/Subject/Autism/Hunter-Gatherer(Pre-Hybridization)/Eternity.

“Every human being is composed of two parts. Only one is essential. The other is the external, artificial and acquired part that is formed in social life and that creates the “person” of the individual: person, here, in the original meaning of the word, that, as known, means mask, the mask of the actor (in opposition to the “face”, that instead you can match with the other part, the essential one). Depending on the individuals, but also depending on the type of civilization, the one or the other part can be more developed. The degenerative limit corresponds with a quite exclusive development of the external and constructed part, of the “mask”.”

-Julius Evola

34_5

Dear introverts, you are the last of a kind: free in mind and spirit, the last hope for Europe and the European species. The Europeans were originally as you are! Remember this when you feel sad or even depressed. The world as it is today is not made for us, free human beings masters of ourselves, it is made for the domesticated man! But it will not last long!

Introversion vs. Extroversion

An excellent post about introversion and extroversion: personally, I totally identify with the features of the introverted human being. I will write a post about introversion, extroversion, hybridization, ice ages and more.

About Forests, Mountains and Rivers

First some Music

Many probably learned in school that there are 2 types of humans, namely introverts and extroverts and that extroverts tend to be rather active (litterally extroverted translates as turned to the outside) and that introverts are rather passive (litterally introverted translates as turned to the inside), but this is not all by any means. I am sure most of the people who are introverted do not know that they are the way they are because of their introversion. This was the case with me. I always knew that I am much more introverted than extroverted, but I did not really know that almost all my (mostly very strange) character features are actually aspects of Introversion.

I therefore want to give you a short overview about the aspects of being introverted (Maybe some of the readers have the same problem that I still had a few days ago…

View original post 514 more words